To offload or not to offload? The existential dilemma of mobile operators
February 2011
Public WiFi networks are popping up like mushrooms in crowded spots where always connected geeks seek shelter for a frappuccino and a facebook update. This should be good news for mobile operators desperate from capacity shortfalls: they can now offload part of their data traffic to less expensive wholesale WiFi bit pipes – or they can even catch a free ride. So should mobile operators embrace the symbiosis and integrate externally cultivated WiFi hotpots in their business models?

Biological parasites can often be useful for their host’s bodies. Likewise, clusters of public WiFi access points provide the obvious offload benefit. But hungry parasites having the urge to multiply can also have dare consequences on their hosts’ valuable organs. Will operators be shooting themselves in the foot if they allow WiFi to become the default radio access point in the most lucrative urban hotspots? Besides the obvious spectrum and infrastructure asset devaluation that this will entail, one can’t resist wondering: will they be willing to hand over customer relationship to WiFi players for saving a few bucks on the cost side? The offload business case rests on the assumption that it is significantly cheaper to provide hot-spot coverage and capacity by buying wholesale access from WiFi clouds than by investing into the self owned cellular infrastructure. But what if a new breed of home grown bacteria challenges this premise?

While it has got relatively little industry attention, cellular network platforms in the last few years have undergone a major evolutional jump. The new generations of previously refrigerator sized base stations now fit in the size of a DVD player. And even more importantly, in conjunction with their shrinking physical dimensions, the hardware cost of modern mobile network equipment has been in free fall during the recent years. Imagine if in the near future the hardware price of a high capacity, GSM – HSPA – LTE combo base station would fall below 10K Euro and small scale “micro” base stations would cost on the order of hundreds of Euros! Of course, that’s only the hardware, and gear makers need to maintain their top line revenues to pay the salaries of their R&D staff. So they keep on charging fortunes for the software licenses required to unlock the otherwise large hardware capacities.Software can now command more than 90% of the CAPEX price tag of a fully configured modern base station.

But luckily for operators, their hungriest suppliers are showing signs of succumbing to market realities and are adopting “gigabyte friendly” software pricing approaches. In such novel gear pricing models the licenses are linked not to the traffic but instead to the number of active customers, in essence squaring off the famous cost-revenue decoupling crisis.

What do you think? Will low cost hardware and “gigabyte friendly” software licensing models, combined with the inherent benefits of protected spectrum and controlled user experience, give an ultimate evolutionary advantage to “home grown” cellular gears over unsanded offload workarounds?
2011
wifi
Back
List of all research reports and external articles


Featured research reports
Volume-based mobile data monetisation is unsustainable
2017
Finland
Germany
Austria
Hungary
Elisa
DeutscheTelekom
Tele2
Telenor
Telefonica
massiveMIMO
5G
mobile-first
spectrum
pricing
networkeconomics

[External post, Linkedin]
September 2017
5G capacity abundance, flat Capex = paradigm shit. Comments from Finnish Elisa's consumer business VP under the article "what makes these [volume-based] pricing ideas profoundly unsustainable".

Digital Fuel Monitor 7th release, 1H2017
2017
dfmonitor
spectrum
data-caps
pricing
mobile-first
zero-rating
roaming
networkeconomics

May 2017 (updated 22.05.2017)
The state of 4G pricing, mobile data usage, spectrum usage, network capacity utilization and fixed-to-mobile broadband substitution. After its comeback in 2016, in 2017 unlimited mobile data goes viral and spreads to 22 countries. And while in competitive markets such as France and Denmark consumers can buy 100 or unlimited gigabytes for less than €30, in tight mobile oligopoly markets such as Portugal, Greece and Hungary €30 hardly buys any gigabytes. Europe’s mobile data divide widens further: 200x more gigabytes for €30 in smartphone plans, 600x more gigabytes in mobile broadband plans, 200x difference in median gigabyte prices, 40x difference in mobile data usage per capita and spectrum usage.

O2 – Ready to disrupt the German tight oligopoly market
2017
networkeconomics
mobile-first
pricing
merger
spectrum
5G
massiveMIMO
Germany
Telefonica
DeutscheTelekom
Vodafone

April 2017
In March 2017 Telefonica O2 Germany announced 3.5 GHz (they have 83 MHz) Massive MIMO (= very high capacity LTE macro sectors) field trials with Huawei for wireless home broadband and 4K video. Our models predict that O2's macro site grid and spectrum resources (FDD+TDD) could allow it to drive fixed-to-mobile broadband substitution in Germany by connecting millions of households with HD TV service on its high capacity LTE network.

Capacity utilization and fixed-to-mobile broadband substitution potential – A study of 64 European operators
2017
networkeconomics
mobile-first
spectrum
5G
massiveMIMO
Finland
United Kingdom
Poland
Austria
Germany
Hutchison
Telefonica
Play
Elisa

March 2017
When LTE base stations are upgraded to 'Gigabit' speed the gigabyte volume capacity of the networks also greatly expands. We modelled LTE network capacity based on existing FDD and TDD spectrum holdings (and potential acquisitions in 2.3 and 3.4-3.8 GHz bands) and sizes of the macro site grids. Without and with Massive MIMO in the TDD bands. Topical for operators contemplating fixed-to-mobile broadband substitution ahead of upcoming 700, 1500 (SDL), 2300, 3400-3600 MHz spectrum auctions.

The market is changing. Mobile data pricing and network economics metrics and research reports for industry professionals
PRO >


Contact us:

Tel: +358442032339
E-mail: research@rewheel.fi
Twitter: @RewheelResearch

Copyright © 2009-2017 Rewheel Oy. All rights reserved.